Sri
Madhvacharya was born in the year 1238 A.D, on the Vijayadashami day of
the month of Aswayuja in a village about three miles from Udupi in
South Canara. His father was a pious brahmin belonging to Bhagavata
Sampradaya and a pauranic by profession. Sri Madhvacharya was born at a
late period in his father’s life after constant prayer and dedication of
vows to Ananteswara in Udipi.
Madhyageha
Bhatta, the father, was therefore happy and proud in no ordinary degree
in his son whom he christened Vasudeva. Boy Vasudeva was very
precocious and his father taught him the three Rs in the privacy of his
house. Not even had the boy attained his teens, when he felt an inner
urge he could not resist, to taking to the holy orders and took sanyasa
under Achutaprekshacharya in Udipi.
Achutaprekshacharya
had been brought up in the then current Adwaita school of thought but
the philosophy of that school did not appeal to the new sanyasi.
Achutaprekshacharya was somewhat displeased with his new disciple but he
was however very much impressed with the earnestness, and scholarship
of his disciple whom he had named as Purnaprajna. Purnaprajna thereupon
began to preach his own philosophy according to which the world is real,
the individual souls are different from Brahman, and Vishnu is the
Highest Entity in the universe. Many a pandit and scholar of other
schools came to him for debate and went back defeated by his keen and
irrefutable logic. Purnaprajna, in order to propagate his faith
undertook a pilgrimage to various shrines in South India and the
pilgrimage was also an opportunity to meet opponents of other schools in
the different places. Immediately after he returned from the pilgrimage
Purnaprajna wrote the commentary on BhagavadGita. The Gita Bhashya
(commentary on the Gita ) is the first work of the Acharya.
Seven
years after he took to holy orders Purnaprajna commenced a pilgrimage
to the North where he touched Benares, Allahabad, Dwaraka, Delhi and
other places and reached the famous Badrikshetra. He composed the
Brahmasutra Bhashya at this place and went further North alone, all by
himself, to the depths of Himalayas, where Sri Vedavyasa is said to have
his abode.. On his return journey Purnaprajna came to the banks of
Godavari and had debates with two eminent and scholarly pandits Sobhana
Bhatta and Samasastry belonging to Adwaita school.
The
Pandits were defeated in the debate and with the conviction of the
truth of the school of philosophy expounded by Purnaprajna, both of them
became his disciples taking up Sanyasa. Shobana Bhatta became the
famous Padmanabhatirtha who succeeded to the pontifical seat of
Purnaprajnacharya. Samasastry became Narahari Thirtha and at the behest
of the acharya stayed behind to obtain the images of Mula Rama and Sita
from the treasury of the local prince. Padmanabha Tirtha followed his
master and was greatly devoted to him.
After
his return to Udipi Purnapragna began to write various works
establishing the new system of philosophy which has come to be called
Dwaitasiddhanta. The cardinal point which distinguishes his system from
others is the essential difference between Brahman who is Independent
and all else which are dependent. This system has therefore come t be
called Dwaitasiddhanta (the philosophy of Basic difference),
Purnaprajnacharya declares himself at the end of many of his works to be
an avatar of the Wind God Vayu and says that his avatar as Purnaprajna
has been foretold in the srutis where he has been called Madhva.
Purnapragnacharya is therefore popularly known as Sri Madhvacharya. The
Acharya founded the Sri Krishna temple at Udipi and established eight
mutts, the sanyasis of which has to worship the image by rotation. The
system of rotation has continued until the present da at Udipi. Sri
Madhva wrote commentaries or Bhashyas on the ten principal Upanishads,
the special treatises called Prakaranas ten in number, the Gita Tatparya
and other works during this period.
Sri
Madhvacharya under took the second tour to the north again. He met
Jalaluddin Khilji at Delhi and seems to have conversed with him in Urdu.
After returning from North he spent the rest of his life in Udipi
occasionally visiting a place called Vishnumangala near Udipi. During
one of his visits to Vishnumangala he had to meet a reputed champion of
the Adwaita school by name
Trivikramapanditacharya. The debate between them seems to have extended
to fifteen days and covered all the different systems of philosophy
like the Bauddha, Sankhya, Nyaya and Adwaita.
In
the end Trivikramapanditacharya has to admit defeat. He was very much
impressed with the Acharya and became his disciple having renounced
Adwaita and accepting the Dvaita sidhanta. The conversion of Pandita
Trivikrama was a great moral victory for the Acharya and many were the
new adherents to his system. Trivikrama Panditacharya became so devoted
the Acharya He wrote the commentary known as Tatvapradipa on the
Brahmasutra Bhashya of Sri Madhwacharya. At his request Sri Madhvacharya
wrote a metrical commentary on the Brahmasutras which is famous as
Anuvyakhyana.
Sri
Madhvacharya had many disciples belonging to the Sanyasa ashrama and
many disciples who were house holders. He vanished from the sight of men
in his eightieth year in the month of Magha on the 9th day of the
bright fortnight while he was teaching the Aitareya Upanishad Bhashya to
his disciples. A shower of flowers is said to have rained on him and he
vanished from the sight of men in the shower of flowers.
Sri
Madhvacharya has written in all thirty seven works. and they are
collectively called Sarvamula. Four of his works are on Brahmasutras,
two on Bhagavad Gita, ten are the commentaries on ten Upanishads, one on
the Mahabharata and one on the Bhagavata in order to determine their
import and ten are the prakaranas. The Rigbhashya is a commentary on the
Rigveda (for a few typical Riks). Seven of his works are of the Stotra
type. Nobody can fail to be impressed by his works. His method is very
brief and simple. His logic is infallible and energetic. The depth of
his scholarship is seen in the profuse ness range and variety of
quotations from various religious texts. His familiarity with the
Upanishadic, puranic, tantric and other literature is in ample evidence
in all his works. He is singularly free from the use of alankaraprayoga
and he is very matter of fact in all his arguments.
The
Brahmasutra Bhshya of the Acharya possesses in full measure the
characteristics a Bhashya should possess. (A words in which the meaning
of the sutras is explained by words similar to those in the sutras and
in which the author explains his own words is called a Bhashya.)
Accordingly the Brahmasutra Bhashya of the Acharya of Sri Madhvacharya
is a very brief and precise composition in contrast with the Bhashyas of
the Acharyas of the other systems. Sri Madhvacharya however reserves
polemical treatment of the Brahmasutras to be effective in Anuvyakhyana.
The commentaries on the Upanishads are peculiar and philosophical hosts
in themselves. Sri Madhvacharya invariably quotes appropriate puranic
and Vedic literature and samhitas with purport to to explain the
Upanishadic passages.
The
direct disciples of Sri Madhvacharya, viz. Padmanabha Tirtha, Narahari
Tirtha, Trivikramapanditacharya and others have written commentaries on
his works. These are called Prachina tikas. They were followed by the
brilliant commentaries of Jayatirtha who is famous as Tikacharya.
Jayathirtha has written commentaries on almost all the works of Sri
Madhvacharya. In particular the commentary on Anuvyakhyana called
“Nyayasudha” is famous as a commentary of the highest merit. The works
of Jayathirtha have been commented upon by many later scholars of whom
Vyasarja and Raghavendra Tirtha are well known.
No comments:
Post a Comment